ABSTRACT

This research paper examines William H. Shaw's ethical arguments for economic justice, focusing on his case for redistribution as a means of addressing economic inequality. Through a critical discourse analysis of Shaw's writings, this study explores his ethical principles and values that underpin his advocacy for redistribution. Shaw's ideas on economic justice are situated within the context of capitalist systems, and his critiques of exploitation, alienation, and social injustice are examined. The paper argues that Shaw's ethical framework provides a compelling case for redistribution as a moral imperative, highlighting the need for a more equitable distribution of resources and wealth. Shaw's argument against the utilitarian approach, which prioritizes overall happiness over individual rights and dignity, is also examined. Instead, Shaw advocates for a distributive justice approach that prioritizes the well-being and agency of marginalized communities. By applying Shaw's ethical principles to contemporary economic systems, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing debate on economic justice and the ethics of redistribution. Through the application of philosophical method of critical analysis, Shaw's work within this study demonstrates the relevance and significance of his ideas for addressing economic inequality and promoting social justice.